ATM error took Rs 10,000 from Surat man. 9 years later, that glitch won him Rs 3.28 lakh
A consumer court in Surat has ordered Bank of Baroda to pay over Rs 3 lakh to a customer after it failed to refund Rs 10,000 from a failed ATM withdrawal for nearly nine years. The customer pursued the matter for several years. The court cited RBI...

Rs 10,000 Withdrawal Failed. 9 Years Later, Surat Man Walks Away With Rs 3 Lakh+
Failed ATM Withdrawal Sparks Long Legal Battle
The case dates back to 18 February 2017, when the customer attempted to withdraw Rs 10,000 from an SBI ATM in Udhna. Although the amount was debited from his account, the cash was not dispensed. According to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) rules, such failed transactions must be reversed within five days.Read more: You don’t need daily gym hours! New study says just 2 sessions a week can keep you fit & fab
However, the customer did not receive the refund within the stipulated period. He submitted a written complaint at the BoB Dumbhal branch on 21 February 2017 and followed up with multiple emails between March and May that year.
Read more: Sara Arjun's role in Dhurandhar 2 puts the spotlight on moles. Influencer explains why they’re special, not flaws to fix
Despite these efforts, the bank neither reversed the amount nor provided any proof that the transaction had been successful.
Efforts to Seek Evidence Yield No Results
In an attempt to gather evidence, the customer filed a Right to Information (RTI) request with SBI on 21 April 2017, seeking CCTV footage of the ATM transaction. When no satisfactory response was received, he approached the Surat Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (CDRC) on 20 December 2017.Bank’s Defence Rejected by Commission
Bank of Baroda argued that it was not liable because the transaction took place at an SBI ATM. The bank claimed it had contacted SBI twice to obtain CCTV footage but did not receive any response. Based on SBI’s records, BoB maintained that the transaction was marked as successful and denied any wrongdoing.SBI did not appear before the court during the proceedings.
The TOI report revealed that the commission rejected BoB’s arguments. It observed that the customer should not suffer due to issues between banks and emphasised that it was BoB’s responsibility to provide strong evidence proving that the cash had been dispensed.RBI Guidelines Support Customer’s Claim
The commission referred to RBI guidelines issued in 2019, which clearly state that failed ATM transactions must be reversed within five days. If there is a delay, banks are required to pay Rs 100 per day as compensation to the customer.Compensation Calculation and Final Order
The total delay amounted to 3,288 days, leading to a compensation of Rs 3,28,800. In addition, the bank has been directed to return the original Rs 10,000 with 9% interest.This case shows that banks must handle customer complaints properly and cannot pass responsibility to other institutions. It highlights the importance of consumer rights and the need for accountability in the banking sector.
Customers facing similar issues can take confidence from this decision, as it shows that consistent follow-up and legal action can still lead to justice, even after many years.
Inputs from TOI
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.