₹12 lakh in stocks, ₹10 lakh health insurance but just ₹18,000 cash in bank account: Corporate employee shares 2 AM ‘rich on paper’ scary reality check
A corporate employee's Reddit post has highlighted the gap between having investments and having readily accessible emergency cash. He claimed that despite holding around ₹12 lakh in stocks and funds and a ₹10 lakh corporate health insurance polic...

₹1.5 lakh advance became an immediate problem
The man said the hospital asked for an advance deposit of ₹1.5 lakh while his mother was in the casualty ward. His investments could not solve the immediate problem because they were not available as instant cash. At the same time, he said the third-party administrator (TPA) handling the corporate insurance was unavailable until morning.He described the situation in his Reddit post as a reality check about being “rich on paper”. The wider hospital bill, according to his post, eventually came to around ₹3.5 lakh.
He had to borrow money at 2 AM
With only ₹18,000 readily available in his bank account, the man said he had to wake up a friend and request a UPI transfer. He also used his credit cards to arrange the money needed for the hospital admission. His mother is now doing well, he said.But the experience made him reconsider how he had structured his finances. While investments were meant for long-term wealth creation and the health policy was intended to cover medical expenses, neither provided him with the immediate liquidity he needed during the emergency.
Why health insurance may not mean instant cash
Health insurance can cover eligible medical expenses, but the payment process may depend on factors such as hospital network status, pre-authorisation, documentation and the insurer or TPA's approval. In the man's case, he claimed that the insurance process could not provide an immediate solution because the TPA office was closed at that hour. This left him needing to arrange money first and deal with the insurance process later.What social media users said
The Reddit post triggered a discussion about keeping emergency money readily accessible. One user said an emergency fund should be kept in a form that can be accessed quickly rather than being invested purely for higher returns. Another pointed to credit cards as a possible backup during emergencies, particularly when a person has investments but cannot liquidate them immediately.A third user shared a similar experience in which emergency savings were held in a liquid fund. The person used high-limit credit cards to pay the hospital and later withdrew money from the fund to settle the bills. Another commenter suggested keeping three to six months of regular expenses readily available as an emergency fund.
The financial blind spot
The incident highlights a distinction between wealth and liquidity. A person may have money invested in stocks, mutual funds or other assets and still struggle to arrange a large amount within minutes. Selling investments can also take time, while the value of market-linked assets can fluctuate.Similarly, having health insurance does not necessarily mean that every hospital expense will be settled instantly at the billing counter. For families, the Reddit discussion underlines the need to think about two separate questions: How much money do I have? And how much can I access right now?
The man's experience suggests that both matter when a medical emergency happens in the middle of the night.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.