Bondi gunmen acted alone, no evidence they were part of militant cell, Australian police say

Two gunmen who allegedly opened fire ‍on a Jewish celebration ​on Sydney's Bondi Beach earlier this month acted ⁠alone and there was "no evidence" they were part of a militant cell, police said on Tuesday.

Naveed Akram and his father Sajid Akram are alleged to ‌have killed ‌15 people at a Hanukkah event on December 14, Australia's worst mass shooting in ‌almost three decades that shocked the nation and led to immediate reforms of already strict gun laws.

Police have previously said the men were inspired by Islamic State, with home made flags of the militant ​group found in their car after the ​attack, and a month-long trip by the pair to ‌a Philippines ‍island previously plagued by militancy a major focus ‍of investigation.


But on Tuesday, Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy ‌Barrett said there was no indication the men had received formal training on the November trip to Mindanao in the Philippines.

"There is no evidence to suggest these alleged offenders were part of a broader terrorist cell, or were directed by others to carry out an attack," Barrett told a ‍news conference.

She added the findings were an initial assessment, and authorities in Australia and the Philippines were ‍continuing their ⁠investigation.

"I am not ⁠suggesting that they were there for tourism," she said, referring to the Philippines trip.

Sajid Akram was shot dead by police during the attack, while his son Naveed, who was also shot by police, was charged with 59 offences after waking from a days-long coma earlier this month. Naveed Akram faces charges ranging from 15 counts of murder to terror and explosives offences.