US Judge says Google need not sell Chrome browser but must do this; here’s what the court ordered the tech giant in its ruling

Google need not sell its Chrome search engine, a US court said in its ruling. However, the tech giant must share data with competitors. This aims to boost competition in online search. Judge Amit Mehta rejected calls to sell Chrome and Android. Su...

AP
Alphabet's Google must share data with rivals to open up competition in online search, US District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington ruled. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)
A US federal judge issued an order on Tuesday (September 2, 2025) saying that Google will not have to sell its popular Chrome search engine. Alphabet's Google must share data with rivals to open up competition in online search, US District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington ruled, while rejecting prosecutors' bid to make the internet giant sell off the Chrome browser and Android operating system.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai expressed concerns at trial in the case in April 2025 that the data-sharing measures sought by the U.S. Department of Justice could enable Google's rivals to reverse-engineer its technology, according to news agency Reuters. Google has said previously that it plans to file an appeal, which means it could take years before the company is required to act on the ruling.

Mehta also barred Google from entering into exclusive agreements that would prohibit device makers from preinstalling rival products on new devices. The District Judge's order came after a long court battle over Google's dominating presence in online search. In 2024, Judge Mehta found that Google illegally trampled its competition in search.


Google had argued that loosening its agreements with device makers, browser developers, and mobile network operators was the only appropriate remedy in the case. The tech giant's most recent deals with device makers Samsung Electronics and Motorola and wireless carriers AT&T and Verizon allow them to load rival search offerings, Reuters reported, citing documents shown at trial in April.

The ruling results from a five-year legal battle between one of the world's most profitable companies and its home country, America, where Mehta ruled in 2024 that the company holds an illegal monopoly in online search and related advertising. At a trial in April, prosecutors argued for far-reaching remedies to restore competition and prevent Google from extending its dominance in search to artificial intelligence. Google said the proposals would go far beyond what is legally justified and would give away its technology to competitors.

Google also embroiled in litigation over dominance in other markets

Besides the case over search, Google is embroiled in litigation over its dominance in other markets. The tech giant recently said it will continue to fight a ruling requiring it to revamp its app store in a lawsuit won by "Fortnite" maker Epic Games. Google is scheduled to go to trial in September 2025 to determine remedies in a separate case brought by the Justice Department, where a judge found the company holds illegal monopolies in online advertising technology.
ADVERTISEMENT

The Justice Department's two cases against Google are part of a larger bipartisan crackdown by the US on Big Tech firms, which began during President Donald Trump's first term and includes cases against Meta Platforms, Amazon, and Apple.
Download
The Economic Times Business News App
for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
Download
The Economic Times News App
for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
READ MORE
ADVERTISEMENT

READ MORE:

LOGIN & CLAIM

50 TIMESPOINTS

More from our Partners

Loading next story
Business News › News › International › US News › US Judge says Google need not sell Chrome browser but must do this; here’s what the court ordered the tech giant in its ruling
Text Size:AAA
Success
This article has been saved

*

+