Tom Barrett has $2.9M, Gabe Evans $3.9M, David Valadao $3.4M: Inside the huge cash gaps shaping US midterm elections 2026

Campaign cash is becoming a key factor separating many of the most highly contested U.S. House races before the 2026 midterms, where some incumbents possess several times more cash than their respective opponents.

According to a CNBC analysis of the recently filed reports with the Federal Election Commission, 11 of 19 House races featuring an incumbent against an opponent had one of the candidates who possessed double the amount of cash compared to the opponent, and all of them were incumbents. In the analysis, the outlet considered the House races rated by The Cook Political Report as toss-ups.

According to The Cook Political Report’s September 25, 2023 ratings, there are 22 toss-ups in the House races, 16 of which are Republican-held and six are Democrat-held. CNBC analysis covered 21 toss-up races while analyzing the finances of only 19 House races with a contender and an incumbent.

Tom Barrett, Gabe Evans and David Valadao show biggest gaps

Some of the widest differences are in Republican-held seats. In Michigan's 7th Congressional District, Republican Rep. Tom Barrett had about $2.9 million in cash on hand, compared with roughly $383,000 for Democrat William Lawrence. That put Barrett's campaign account at more than seven times Lawrence's balance. FEC data shows Barrett reported $2,871,871.94 in cash at the end of his July 15 reporting period, while Lawrence reported about $383,116.

Colorado's 8th District shows another large gap. Republican Rep. Gabe Evans had about $3.9 million, while Democratic challenger Manny Rutinel had roughly $601,000. FEC-based data puts Evans' cash at $3,880,463 and Rutinel's at $601,232 at the end of the June 30 reporting period.

California's 22nd District presents a similar picture. Republican Rep. David Valadao had about $3.4 million available, while Democratic challenger Randy Villegas had about $572,000. FEC records show $3,365,587.25 for Valadao and $571,792.32 for Villegas as of June 30.

New York's 17th District illustrates another substantial incumbent cushion. Republican Rep. Mike Lawler had about $4.84 million, compared with approximately $1.32 million for Democratic challenger Cait Conley, according to the latest FEC-based figures.

Not every incumbent has more cash

However, the big picture is not as straightforward as one would expect, where either the incumbent or the challenger has a clear advantage.

For example, CNBC reported that six candidates challenging their incumbent had more money in the bank than their incumbent opponents but did not have twice the money. These included the 1st District in Iowa, Pennsylvania’s 8th and 10th district, and Virginia’s 2nd District.

In the 1st District of Iowa, Democrat Christina Bohannan had about $5.4 million in her campaign account, while Republican Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks only had about $4.7 million in her account. The Federal Election Commission data showed that Bohannan had $5,425,318 in her account while Miller-Meeks had $4,691,481 as of June 30.

In addition, Pennsylvania’s 10th district is also in the challenger money lead category. The Democrat, Janelle Stelson, had around $4.5 million, while the Republican candidate Rep. Scott Perry had around $2.8 million. The June 30 figures on FEC were $4,478,639 and $2,845,976 for each candidate, respectively.

In Pennsylvania’s 8th district, Democrat Paige Cognetti had around $3.4 million against $2.6 million held by Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan. The figures reported as of June 30 were $3,406,710 and $2,608,048, respectively.

The 2nd district of Virginia also falls under relatively close challenger money lead. Democrat Elaine Luria had around $3.6 million against $3.4 million held by Republican Rep. Jennifer Kiggans, according to CNBC.

Some Democratic incumbents also hold large war chests

The cash disparities are not confined to Republican incumbents. CNBC reported that Democratic Reps. Jared Moskowitz of Florida and Vicente Gonzalez of Texas each had more than three times the cash of their Republican opponents in their respective competitive districts.

FEC data shows Moskowitz's campaign reported $1.88 million in cash on hand through July 29, while Gonzalez reported $2.53 million at the end of June. The relevant challenger figures and CNBC's comparative ratios depend on the particular FEC reporting dates available when the analysis was compiled.

Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur had nearly $3.5 million in her campaign account, compared with about $531,000 for Republican challenger Derek Merrin. The FEC figures were $3,491,668 for Kaptur and $531,214 for Merrin at the end of June.

What "cash on hand" actually means

Campaign cash on hand is not synonymous with all funds a candidate has raised throughout the campaign.

According to the Federal Election Commission, campaign closing cash-on-hand is defined as the "campaign's ending cash balance on the most recent filing." This metric reflects the money left in the campaign account after all receipts and expenses incurred up to the date of the report have been tallied.

This figure becomes particularly important in analyzing the amount of money that will be available for the last phase of the campaign.

The overall figures provided by the Federal Election Commission in regard to 2026 illustrate the amount of money flowing into federal campaigns. Up until March 31, congressional candidates had raised $2.1 billion and spent $1.3 billion, accumulating $1.36 billion cash altogether.