US automakers head for union showdown
As financial losses mount, US automakers are headed for a showdown with the United Auto Workers union in contract negotiations this summer.
By Agencies |
DETROIT: As financial losses mount, US automakers are headed for a showdown with the United Auto Workers union in contract negotiations this summer. While the United Auto Workers (UAW) made major concessions last year as GM and Ford began racking up multibillion dollar losses, dissent is brewing among the rank-and-file.
One issue which has drawn significant union ire is that Ford is considering giving bonuses to executives while it is in the midst of laying off 44,000 workers and shuttering 16 plants across North America. Ford Motor CEO Alan Mulally defended that decision in a conference call last week discussing the automaker���s $12.7 billion annual loss in 2006, saying that ���competitive��� compensation packages were necessary to retain top management.
Meanwhile, investors are pressuring automakers to make sweeping changes to the contracts, which include some of the highest wages in industrial America as well as generous health-care and pension benefits. Mr Mulally, who presided over a strike when he was head of Boeing, said Ford had a good relationship with the UAW but said his first priority will be increasing Ford���s competitiveness.
GM, which lost more than $2.5 billion in 23 strikes between 1990 and 1998 as it battled with the union over downsizing, is more strike adverse. The toughest talks may be at DaimlerChrysler where executives from the Chrysler Group have been frustrated by the UAW���s refusal to approve contract modifications on health care similar to those the union made at GM and Ford in 2005.
The union���s refusal meant Chrysler���s 55,000 workers got a raise of roughly $1 per hour while GM and Ford workers gave up a pay increase as part of the health-care concessions. Chrysler Group CEO Tom LaSorda has insisted the union must grant concessions. So far, however, the UAW has balked and the dispute over concessions continues to simmer, though the union agreed to take another look at DaimlerChrysler���s financial reports. A UAW spokesman declined to comment on the negotiations over the union���s current four-year contract which runs out September 14.
Harley Shaiken, a labour expert from the University of California-Berkley with close ties to the UAW, said 2007 contract talks in Detroit could wind up being far less dramatic than some analysts anticipate. ���Clearly these are trying times,��� Mr Shaiken said. ���The general sentiment inside the union is to do something to help the companies.��� However, the UAW isn���t willing to give up on key principles, such as making sure it protects the incomes of long-time employees idled by management, Mr Shaiken said.
And some union members are actively pushing for a tough stance. ���Should workers volunteer to bankrupt themselves to save the company? Or should the companies and the unions together demand a solution that benefits all Americans by levelling the playing field with our European and Japanese competitors?��� noted Greg Shotwell, a GM worker in Lansing, Michigan.
���The UAW has bargained too narrowly for too long. We deserve a strategy of confrontation that connects the struggle of union members with the struggle of all Americans,��� Mr Shotwell said in recent e-mail to Soldiers of Solidarity, which he founded in 2005 to prod the union into greater militancy.
Download
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
Download
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
ADVERTISEMENT
