New China law to change rules for foreign business
Analysts say the new measures, which states media say are due to be approved this week, have grown out of fears that the increasing muscle of foreign firms is putting the squeeze on home-grown companies. But they are also the product of a booming economy whose biggest problem now is trying to get money flowing out of the country — not coming in. “China isn’t desperate for foreign investment anymore,” said Chen Xingdong, chief Chinese economist with BNP Paribas Securities in Beijing.
“Some foreign mergers and acquisitions have added competitive pressure on local companies, so a policy change is necessary,” he told agencies.
China has long signaled growing anxiety about the expanding power of foreign enterprises at home, especially since the country joined the World Trade Organisation in 2001.
Officials have warned about multinationals using their advantages in technology, branding and capital to weed out Chinese competitors, citing giants like Microsoft that have become dominant in their sectors. “From the point of view of protecting local companies, it does make some sense,” Chen said of the new law.
But it also marks a sea-change for policy in China, which for a generation has largely fuelled its economic boom by making it easy for foreign firms simply to show up with a big bag of money — and get down to business.
For the first three decades of economic reform, China was often more than willing to let foreigners in, and allowed them to do business under less stringent rules than locals.
A prime example was a preferential tax treatment — now about to be phased out — which allowed foreigners to pay as little as half of what their Chinese competitors had to hand over to state coffers.
The “spoil-the-foreigners” policy has proven spectacularly successful, funding growth that has catapulted China to the position of the world’s fourth-largest economy and its third-largest exporter. But with foreign exchange reserves now topping $1.3 trillion, China is no longer short of cash.
“The bottom line is China has got too much money, so the national policy is changing from primarily attracting money to slowing down the inflow and encouraging outflow,” said Andy Xie, an independent Shanghai-based economist.
Another factor is a rise in the proportion of foreign investment that is accounted for by mergers and acquisitions.
According to official statistics, the number of mergers and acquisitions only made up 5% of foreign direct investment in China annually up till 2003, rising to 11% in 2004 and almost 20% in 2005.
Merkel’s request to China: Meanwhile, German chancellor Angela Merkel on Monday urged China to respect the rules of international trade and development, as Premier Wen Jiabao insisted the rising Asian giant was no threat.
In her first official meeting of a three-day trip to China, Merkel discussed with Wen and President Hu Jintao ways to improve trade ties between the world’s third and fourth biggest economies.
“Mergers and acquisitions may not add a lot to economic development, but they add a lot of money,” Xie said.
“They might inflate asset prices at a time when China has a serious bubble problem. When investors all over the world try to squeeze in, it might create a much bigger bubble.”
Analysts say most foreign firms would now have to consider more carefully what other advantages they bring, such as management skill and technological know-how, when jumping into the market.
“Though the law may not be to the advantage of multinational companies, China needs a comprehensive and enforced set of competition laws to become a fully developed economy,” Wang Xiaoye, a legal scholar at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the China Daily newspaper recently.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.