'Why no regime change in Iran?': Trump's big hint as he contradicts Vance, Hegseth amid mid-east crisis

US President Donald Trump recent remarks on Iran paints a picture of contradiction from his his top allies’ that the United States wasn’t attempting a “regime change” in Iran. Trump questioned Sunday the possibility of regime change in Iran following US military strikes against key Iranian military sites over the weekend. His remarks came after the US sent 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs crashing into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site with Tehran vowing to defend itself at all costs.

After the US bombed key Iranian nuclear facilities- Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear facilities- over the weekend, key members of Trump's inner circle notably Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio–has been in damage control. In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump unravelled the narrative that the strikes on Iran were not leading up to a “regime change” in the region. Trump appeared to support a potential regime change in Iran, seemingly contradicting his own administration's stand that 'Operation Midnight Hammer' was not aimed at bringing a regime change in Iran.

“It’s not politically correct to use the term, “Regime Change,” but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!” he wrote.


The president’s latest comments contradict his closest allies after the US joined Israel in strikes against three nuclear Iranian sites on Saturday.

ALSO READ: 'God help us all': Trump's appointment of 22-year-old college grad to terrorism unit amid Iran crisis faces backlash

Vance says US does not want a regime change

But what is worth noting is that US President JD Vance's remark was not on the similar lines. On Sunday Vance insisted the NBC's 'Meet he Press' that the United States was not entering a war with Iran, adamantly defending the president’s decision to bomb the country’s nuclear sites as a purely tactical move. “We are not at war with Iran, we are at war with Iran’s nuclear program,” the vice president said.

When asked by host Kristen Welker if the United States supports Israel killing Iran’s leader, Vance responded, “Well, look, that’s up to the Israelis, but our view has been very clear that we don’t want a regime change. We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it’s already been built out. We want to end their nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here.”

“What we said to the Iranians is we do not want war with Iran; we actually want peace. But we want peace in the context of them not having a nuclear weapons program, and that’s exactly what the president accomplished last night,” he continued.

Similar sentiments were echoed by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio who assured CBS News that the bombings were a “very precise mission” and “not an attack on the Iranian people.”

ALSO READ: A list of 'safest' countries to seek shelter as World War III fear looms

“This wasn’t a regime-change move. This was designed to degrade and/or destroy three nuclear sites related to their nuclear weaponization ambitions, and that was delivered on yesterday,” he said.

“What happens next is up to the regime. The regime wants peace, we’re ready for peace. They want to do something else, they’re incredibly vulnerable. They can’t even protect their own airspace.” When asked whether Iran was headed towards a regime change, Rubio strongly denied it.

“You don’t have to like the regime. There are a lot of regimes around the world that we don’t like. Okay, but in this particular case, what we are focused on is not the changing of the regime. Okay, that’s up to the Iranian people if they want to do that, but that’s not what we’re focused on. Our national interest is about one thing, and that is Iran not getting anywhere near the capability to weaponize and have nuclear weapons.”

ALSO READ: Tulsi Gabbard snubbed by Trump after US spy chief defied her Iran advice? Pics from Situation room sparks buzz

In a similar manner, when US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was quizzed about potential regime change in Iran, he quickly answered, “This mission was not and has not been about regime change. The President authorized a precision operation to neutralize the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program.”

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned on Sunday that the United States would bear “sole and full responsibility for the dangerous consequences” of its actions, as Iran considers its response. Araghchi accused President Trump of “betraying” the American people and said the move had crossed “a significant red line.”

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump’s move as a “bold decision,” noting that the two nations acted in “full coordination.”