Kate Middleton’s name became a royal branding battle and Prince William was reportedly ‘fuming’

Prince William was reportedly left “fuming” after King Charles III and Queen Camilla suggested that Catherine, Princess of Wales, change the spelling of her first name when she joined the royal family, according to a new biography by author Christopher Andersen.

The reported request centred on the royal family’s monograms and crests. Charles and Camilla both have royal monograms featuring interlocking Cs beneath a crown, and Andersen wrote in his book, Kate! The Courage, Grace, and Power of the Woman Who Will Be Queen, that the couple worried adding another C to the royal insignia would be excessive.

Also read: Prince William and Kate Middleton’s annual income revealed


“Would Kate mind if she changed the spelling of her full name from ‘Catherine’ to ‘Katherine,’” Andersen wrote, according to Fox News Digital.

The proposal apparently did not sit well with William. Andersen said the Prince of Wales viewed the request as an affront not only to his wife but also to her family.

“Offended by yet another command from on high essentially aimed at placating Camilla, a fuming William replied on his wife’s behalf. The request was nothing less than ‘insulting,’ he told his father, not only to Kate but to her entire family,” Andersen wrote.

Kensington Palace told Fox News Digital it does not comment on books. The account, therefore, comes from Andersen’s biography and the royal commentators cited in the report.

One letter, a much bigger royal row

Andersen argued that the episode illustrated how seriously the royal household treats image and branding, saying the monarchy can resemble “a giant game of one-upmanship”.

He also portrayed William as having consistently defended Kate, particularly when her privacy and wellbeing were at stake. Andersen recalled the prince’s response after topless photographs of Kate sunbathing were published by a French magazine in 2012, saying William “came out ‘guns blazing’ in her defense”.

According to Andersen, William also sought to ensure Kate would not be saddled with an excessive royal workload after the couple had children if it meant spending too much time away from them.

The author said Charles and Camilla may have expected Kate to accept the proposed spelling change because she had a reputation for being cooperative. But Andersen said they overlooked her own preference for the name Catherine and her attachment to the name chosen by her parents.

Although she is widely known as Kate, her formal given name is Catherine.

Andersen described the princess as “genuinely fond” of Charles and said she apparently assumed the unusual suggestion had originated elsewhere. He added that she did not harbour resentment towards the king, particularly as events soon shifted the royal family’s priorities.

“Besides, it wasn’t long before they were having to deal with their simultaneous cancer diagnoses, which put everything else in stark perspective,” Andersen wrote.

Also read: Report reveals how Kate Middleton is preparing to fill in the Queen’s shoes

A ‘bridge too far’ for Catherine

Andersen said the episode also reflected Catherine’s determination beneath her public image.

“Kate is very secure about who she is and how she wants to be perceived by the outside world,” he said. “Changing her formal given name for such a bizarre, almost comical reason was a bridge too far.”

Royal commentators quoted by Fox News Digital offered varying interpretations. Broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard called the idea a “nonstarter” and a “lost cause”, while suggesting Charles and Camilla may have been approaching the issue from a branding perspective because the princess was already known publicly as Kate.

Royal broadcaster Ian Pelham Turner described the episode as a possible “volatile moment” between Camilla and Catherine as she entered the royal family, although he said William was there to protect his wife. He also suggested Catherine has since built a stronger public identity of her own.

Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams was considerably less diplomatic.

“If true, it’s idiotic,” Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. “The idea is simply stupid. And why? Because her name began with C and theirs did!”

For Andersen, however, the story is less about one letter than the symbolism surrounding the monarchy. He said the incident “speaks volumes about how conscious the royals are of all the bells and whistles” surrounding their institution — extending even to the letters used in their crests and coats of arms.

What may look like an absurdly small branding dispute from the outside, in other words, was presented as another glimpse into the elaborate world of royal image-making.