From Jackie Kennedy to Jill Biden: Michelle Obama looks back at how first ladies changed the White House while protecting its historic legacy

Michelle Obama, former first lady of the United States, is now using the example of one of the most important women in White House history to make a statement regarding life in the nation's most recognisable house. Obama, in her essay paying homage to Jackie Kennedy, praised past first ladies for their efforts in changing the White House by considering it as an institution belonging to the country and not as personal property.

It is taking place at a time when President Donald Trump is effecting major changes in the White House.

Also Read | 81 US aircraft lost in Iran war: Why the MQ-9 Reaper losses could be a bigger warning for America than the billions spent replacing them


However, the essay does not name the members of the Trump administration or even First Lady Melania Trump. Meanwhile, she has named Jackie Kennedy and how the previous administrations had tackled the challenge of restoration and preservation of the White House.

"In Pursuit" is an anthology of biographical essays for America’s 250th anniversary.

However, the main point of her essay is more about stewardship than interior design. Obama believes that although a president can be a temporary resident of the White House, the White House itself belongs to the American people.

Jackie Kennedy's White House restoration became a national model

It is evident that Jackie Kennedy’s influence on the White House was not limited to being known for her style alone.

Through her influence as the First Lady of the United States, she managed to preserve the historical furniture in the rooms and helped make the residence a showcase of the country’s history.

Also Read | Strait of Hormuz, uranium and oil prices: The three issues now standing between Trump and an Iran war deal

Obama uses that history to explain why Kennedy remains an important example for first families. As stated in USA Today, Obama notes that previous presidents' families knew that their victory in the election does not mean that they owned the White House.

They are merely caretakers of a property that has been part of the nation’s history for decades.

This is very crucial in the sense that the White House is both an operational building and a historical monument. The president requires state-of-the-art facilities; however, this would affect the building’s history since it is comprised of historical rooms and architecture.

Obama has also highlighted the practicality of renovating the building. The White House is more than 200 years old; thus, it cannot remain static considering its present use.

Her argument, as described by USA Today, is therefore not that the White House should never change. It is that change should be balanced with preservation.

Michelle Obama points to first ladies across political eras

Obama's tribute does not limit its praise to Democrats.

She highlights Nancy Reagan, noting her efforts to introduce furniture associated with America's early history. She also praises Jill Biden for expanding public access to the White House through changes to the visitor experience.

Other first ladies receive recognition as well.

USA Today explains that Obama gives credit to Pat Nixon, Hillary Clinton and Laura Bush for their thoughtful refurbishing of the Blue Room and Green Room, respectively. Each project is distinct in design and objective, yet Obama considers them together as examples of how first ladies participate in the bigger historical trend of preservation.

The past is relevant here because many changes have been taking place at the White House under different administrations.

Every new first family has had its own tastes, requirements and needs. Nevertheless, any major change has been a result of consultations with experts in preservation and historians as well as White House preservation commissions.

Obama's essay provides an account of these examples together with Kennedy's restoration activities.

Trump's White House renovations bring the contrast into focus

The timing of Obama's essay gives her comments an obvious political backdrop even though she never mentions Trump by name.

Trump has made substantial physical changes to the White House during his current presidency. USA Today reported that those changes include extensive gold and gilded decoration inside the Oval Office, work affecting the Rose Garden and the demolition of the East Wing as part of plans for a large ballroom.

The scale of the proposed ballroom has attracted particular attention because the East Wing has traditionally housed offices associated with the first lady and other White House operations.

Critics have also questioned whether the current administration has followed the same independent preservation process that accompanied earlier major projects.

In light of the above background, the idea that first families are just temporary caretakers for their time takes on new meaning.

Although her essay does not accuse the present-day administration of breaching this idea, she sets forth a standard with the help of examples from history. This makes it possible to renovate the White House without doing any injustice to its national importance.

This way, she can make her criticism known without making the whole essay seem like a political attack.

Obama's deeper message is about stewardship, not decoration

The most interesting aspect of Obama's speech might have nothing to do with wallpaper or furniture at all.

She describes Kennedy's approach to raising children inside the White House as another example of caring for something without claiming ownership. Obama relates this to the unique challenge that comes to the fore for presidential families, where one has to shield one’s children while also working for the nation.

That principle also explains why she sees Kennedy's legacy as relevant beyond interior design.

The White House is the property of the people, whereas the president and his family stay there only for a while. Hence, there can be occasions for remodelling the place, but this comes with a certain obligation which is not present at home.

USA Today reported that Obama's essay presents Kennedy's approach to stewardship as more enduring than any particular design choice she made.

That distinction gives the tribute a broader historical significance. Jackie Kennedy is remembered partly for transforming the White House's interiors, but Obama's admiration rests more heavily on the way Kennedy understood her role.

For Obama, the lesson appears to be straightforward: first families can leave their mark on the White House without treating the building as something they own.

And by tracing that tradition from Jackie Kennedy through Nancy Reagan, Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush and Jill Biden, her essay offers a different way of looking at the latest chapter in the long history of presidential renovations.