Bernanke must raise benchmark rate by 2 points: Raghuram Rajan
IMF's former chief economist says the Federal Reserve should consider raising rates, even as almost 10% of US workforce remains unemployed.
Interest rates near zero risk fanning asset bubbles or propping up inefficient companies, say Rajan and William White, former head of the Bank for International Settlements’ monetary and economic department. After Europe’s debt crisis recedes, Fed Chairman Ben S Bernanke should start increasing his benchmark rate by as much as 2 percentage points, so it’s no longer negative in real terms, Rajan says.
“Low rates are not a free lunch, but people are acting as though they are,” said White, 67, who retired in 2008 from the Basel, Switzerland-based BIS and now chairs the Economic Development and Review Committee at the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. “There will be pressure on central banks to follow an expansionary monetary policy, and I worry that one can see the benefits, but what people inadequately appreciate are the downsides.”
He and Rajan will have the chance to make their case at the Fed’s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, this week. In 2003, White told attendees central banks might need to raise rates to combat asset-price bubbles. In 2005, Rajan, 47, said risks in the banking system had increased. They were met with scepticism from then-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, 84, and Governor Donald Kohn, 67.
Losing Confidence
While the Fed did boost its target rate for overnight loans among banks in quarter-point steps to 5.25% by 2006 from 1% in 2004, that didn’t prevent a housing bubble, which began to pop in 2006. Banks began losing confidence in August of the same year and started charging other financial institutions higher interest on loans.
A minority of policy makers are increasingly echoing Rajan and White’s current worries, including Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig, who is hosting the August 26-28 symposium, and Andrew Sentance, one of the nine members on the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee.
Hoenig has dissented from all five Fed policy decisions this year, preferring to jettison a pledge to keep rates low for an “extended period.” Sentance was defeated for a third month in August in his bid to withdraw emergency stimulus by increasing the benchmark interest rate.
Few Converts
The naysayers may fail to win many converts any time soon as the recovery slows and US unemployment, at 9.5% in July, remains near a 26-year high. The resulting extension of low rates may increase volatility of government bonds, especially in response to any stronger-than-anticipated economic data, said Marc Fovinci, head of fixed income at Ferguson Wellman Capital Management.
Indications that growth will be at least 3% “in the coming months” would cause yields on 10-year Treasuries, which were 2.61% on August 20, to rise to 3% within about a week, said Fovinci, who is based in Portland, Oregon, and helps invest $2.5 billion.
JPMorgan Chase & Co reduced its forecast last week for growth in this quarter to an annual rate of 1.5% from 2.5% and in the last three months of 2010 to 2% from 3%. “I’m not worried about inflation, because the economy appears to be weak,” Fovinci said. At the same time, the bond market seems to be “tightly coiled up like a spring.”
‘Bad Incentives’
Near-zero rates create “bad incentives” for financial firms, he added. “Blow the system up, we’ll come back and reward you with very low interest rates that allow you to build up capital, and then you could try it again next time around,” Rajan said.
The Fed also may be “prolonging pain” by propping up the housing market and keeping home prices from falling, he said. Companies are sending mixed signals. “Demand is very low across the country,” for houses, Richard Dugas, chief executive of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan-based Pulte Group, said August 20 on Bloomberg Television’s “In the Loop with Betty Liu.” Meanwhile, Caterpillar, the world’s largest maker of construction equipment, may add as many as 9,000 workers worldwide this year, Doug Oberhelman, chief executive of the Peoria, Illinois-based company, said on August 19.
White, a Bank of Canada deputy governor from 1988 to 1994, says the benefits of low rates may already be waning “in a world with so much debt, especially household debt,” which in the US totalled a near-record $11.7 trillion at the end of June. There’s also a danger they might create another bubble, he said.
Another risk is that near-zero rates allow companies to roll over nonviable loans, a practice known as “evergreening” that can create so-called zombie businesses, which happened in Japan, he added. Rajan and White’s arguments aren’t winning over Keith Hembre, chief economist at US Bancorp’s FAF Advisors in Minneapolis, where he helps oversee $86 billion.
“There’s little evidence that the very low rates today are inflicting any harm,” said Hembre, a former Fed researcher. While he has “some longer-term sympathy with the argument,” it’s “just off-base today, given the evidence available from both real-time and market indicators.”
Emergency Measures
White and Rajan have ruffled central-bank feathers before at Jackson Hole, where policy makers, academics, analysts and money managers from dozens of countries mix hiking and rafting in Grand Teton National Park with debate over monetary policy and bank regulation. In 2003, White and then-colleague Claudio Borio, who was head of BIS research and policy analysis, told central bankers they might need to raise interest rates to “lean against” asset-price bubbles.
‘Cannot Work’
“The one thing I am sure about is that a mild calibration of monetary policy to address asset-price bubbles does not and cannot work,” Greenspan, who retired in 2006, responded at the conference. Bernanke, then a Fed governor, told attendees that Japan raised rates in 1989 to prick a bubble, and as a result, “asset prices collapsed and they had a 14-year depression.”
In 2005, Rajan warned that if banks lost confidence in each other, “the interbank market could freeze up, and one could well have a full-blown financial crisis.” Kohn disagreed in a speech after Rajan’s presentation. “As a consequence of greater diversification of risks and of sources of funds, problems in the financial sector are less likely to intensify shocks hitting the economy and financial market,” he said.
More Open
Spyros Andreopoulos, a London-based global economist at Morgan Stanley, says he worries about the inflationary implications of extreme monetary accommodation beyond the next 2-3 years, with policy makers likely to lean toward low rates because of the fear of deflation. “Imagine a car that’s stuck in the mud,” he said. “When you press on the gas, the car doesn’t emerge smoothly; it jumps up. My fear is when economies pick up after the stimulus, you’ll see inflation faster than was expected.”
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.