SC seeks tough measures to combat stubble burning crisis; asks govt to deny MSP to offenders

In a bid to curb the persistent issue of stubble burning contributing to severe air pollution, the Supreme Court presented a stern message to farmers, suggesting the discontinuation of crop purchases under the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system.

Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia emphasized the need to deter those violating regulations, highlighting that individuals engaging in stubble burning should not benefit monetarily from the MSP system. The bench stressed the importance of halting these harmful agricultural practices for improved air quality and urged long-term strategies for crop substitution.

The court's directive resonates with the plea for a sustainable solution to the prevailing crisis. Expressing concerns over the impact of stubble burning on public health and the environment, the bench underscored the necessity for immediate action. They emphasized the imperative for farmers to cease these practices, pointing out the significant repercussions on society and the environment.


Acknowledging the complexities surrounding the MSP system and its influence on economic stability and food security, a submission highlighted the intricate evaluations conducted by the Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP). Any alterations or selective implementations of MSP demand a comprehensive analysis due to their potential far-reaching consequences.

Moreover, the bench monitored the steps taken by the government and urged the promotion of alternative crops to replace rice cultivation, which has contributed to water depletion and stubble burning. Stressing the detrimental long-term effects of persistent paddy cultivation, the court urged the Center and Punjab government to collaborate in finding a solution, setting aside political differences.

While the Punjab government disclosed taking legal actions against stubble burning with registered FIRs and debarring offenders from benefits, the Center reported a reduction in burning incidents but highlighted the insufficient ground-level implementation of anti-stubble burning measures, especially in Punjab. The status report also revealed contrasting enforcement scenarios between Haryana and Punjab, with Haryana exhibiting better enforcement practices.

The court's vigilant oversight aims to address the root cause of the crisis, emphasizing the urgent need for collaborative efforts between authorities and farmers to mitigate the adverse effects of stubble burning on public health and the environment.

(With inputs from TOI)