SC considers measures against 'bulldozer justice' amidst controversy

The Supreme Court is considering guidelines to address the practice of "bulldozer justice." Recently, various groups, including Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, submitted proposals to the court to prevent such actions. The parties argued that alleged involvement in a crime should not justify demolishing someone's home or business. They recommended that officials issue a two-month notice before any demolition.

Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind urged the court to prohibit government officials and politicians from making statements supporting illegal demolition actions. They suggested criminal prosecution if such statements are made. "A minimum of two months from the date of service should be given to the owner to furnish a reply to the show cause," they stated in their proposal.

The groups also proposed that authorities conduct a survey of the neighborhood before deciding on any demolition. If a house is marked for demolition, the survey should identify other similarly liable properties, ensuring no selective action. They recommended penal consequences for officers who violate these guidelines, including compensation for the affected individuals.


Another proposal highlighted the need for courts to scrutinize the reasons behind demolition orders. They asserted that demolitions linked to criminal charges, carried out hastily, or selectively targeting specific properties should be presumed malicious and therefore illegal.