HC refuses to entertain PIL to end pension disparity between armed forces under MHA, Defence Ministry

In his petition, the Trust has stated that the forces under the MHA i.e. BSF, CISF, CRPF etc are also armed forces and therefore cannot be discriminated against.

PTI
Border Security Force patrol at a flooded area at Basantar river near International border, in Samba district, Tuesday, July 27, 2021
The Delhi High Court Thursday refused to entertain a PIL seeking direction to the Centre to extend the same pension scheme to armed forces under the Home Ministry as is applicable to the forces under the Defence Ministry.

A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, which was hearing the PIL by Humara Desh Humare Jawan Trust, said that several petitions by the aggrieved personnel are already pending adjudication.

“Affected people are already before court. They don't need a PIL. Matter is already under consideration. There is a bunch of petitions,” Justice Endlaw said, adding that the outcome of the pending pleas would be applicable to those who are similarly placed.


“Each and every person is not required to be there. Point which you are raising is raised by affected parties and they are ably represented,” the judge told the counsel for the Trust, advocate Ajay K Agrawal

Chief Justice Patel stated that there was no need to have multiple petitions on the same issue and asked the petitioner to join the pending proceedings.

“You go there and file a CM (application),” Chief Justice Patel told the counsel.
ADVERTISEMENT

The court allowed the Trust to withdraw its petition with liberty to avail other legal remedies or join the pending proceedings.

In his petition, the Trust has stated that the forces under the MHA i.e. BSF, CISF, CRPF etc are also armed forces and therefore cannot be discriminated against.

It is stated that the Centre is “illegally denying the old pension scheme” to the forces under MHA by making them subject to the new contributory pension scheme, which was introduced in 2004, on the ground that they are not “armed forces of the Union”.

“These forces are protecting our borders round the clock and thousands personnel have laid their lives protecting our borders.. Both are armed forces of the Union under the Ministry of Defence and Home, therefore, there should be no disparity and same pensionary benefits should be given to both,” the petition reads.
ADVERTISEMENT

The plea states that in August 2004, the Centre has itself issued a clarification that the central forces under the MHA as also “armed forces of the Union” and would include the BSF, CISF, CRPF, ITBP, NSG, SSB and Assam Rifles.
Download
The Economic Times Business News App
for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
Download
The Economic Times News App
for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
READ MORE
ADVERTISEMENT

READ MORE:

LOGIN & CLAIM

50 TIMESPOINTS

More from our Partners

Loading next story
Business News › News › Defence › HC refuses to entertain PIL to end pension disparity between armed forces under MHA, Defence Ministry
Text Size:AAA
Success
This article has been saved

*

+