IPO vs NFO explained: What investors should know before making an investment

New fund offers (NFOs) often attract investors through aggressive marketing and the appeal of entering a new scheme at launch. Investors should look beyond the hype and assess whether the NFO offers something different and fills a genuine gap in their portfolio, as ETBureau reported.

A mutual fund house launches a New Fund Offer (NFO) when it wants to introduce a new scheme and raise money from investors to build its portfolio. New fund houses typically use NFOs to build their product basket, while existing AMCs launch them to fill gaps or expand their range of schemes.

There have also been concerns that some NFOs are aggressively pushed as they allow fund houses to offer higher incentives to distributors and mobilise assets quickly, rather than fill a genuine gap in an investor’s portfolio.

An IPO (Initial Public Offering) involves a company offering its shares to the public for the first time, either to raise fresh capital or allow existing shareholders to sell their stakes.
An NFO, on the other hand, is the launch of a new mutual fund scheme. The money collected from investors is used to build a portfolio of stocks, bonds or other securities based on the scheme’s investment strategy

Investors in an IPO, therefore, become shareholders of the company. Investors in an NFO own units of the mutual fund scheme rather than shares of a company. The two should not be confused because NFOs are sometimes marketed like IPOs, creating an impression that investors are getting an opportunity to buy into a fund at a low or attractive price of Rs 10 per unit.

Investors should consider an NFO only if its investment strategy fills a gap in their portfolio or offers something significantly different from existing schemes.

Since an NFO has no scheme-level track record, investors should evaluate the AMC, fund manager, investment process and performance of comparable schemes before investing. They should also check whether an existing fund already offers a similar strategy with an established track record.

Since an NFO has no scheme-level track record, investors should evaluate the AMC, fund manager, investment process and performance of comparable schemes before investing. They should also check whether an existing fund already offers a similar strategy with an established track record.