BHEL shares soar 13% after Q4 net profit rockets 156% YoY to Rs 1,290 crore, revenue up 37%

Shares of PSU Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL) rallied as much as 13% to their day’s high of Rs 399 on the BSE on Monday after the company reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 1,290.50 for the March quarter, a sharp 156% increase from the same period last year. The net profit is attributable to the owners of the company.

BHEL Q4 Results

The company’s revenue from operations came in at Rs 12,310 crore, up 37% from the same period last year. In Q4FY25, BHEL’s revenue from operations stood at Rs 8,993 crore.

Its EBITDA came in at Rs 1,754 crore, compared to Rs 832 crore year-on-year. EBITDA is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. Margin improved to 14.2% from 9.2% year-on-year.


For the quarter under review, BHEL’s other income increased to Rs 243 crore from Rs 149.27 crore in Q4FY25. The company also reported a 28.3% year-on-year increase in total expenses for the quarter, rising to Rs 10,842.69 crore from Rs 8,448.14 crore in the same period last year.

BHEL Dividend Payout

Alongside Q4, the board recommended a final dividend of Rs 1.40 per share of face value Rs 2 each, equivalent to 70% of the paid-up share capital for FY26. If approved at the Annual General Meeting, the dividend will be paid or dispatched within 30 days from the meeting date.

For Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, total expenses in the quarter rose 28.3% year-on-year to Rs 10,842.69 crore, up from Rs 8,448.14 crore in the same period last year.

Also read: Tamil Nadu election impact: Sun TV Network shares plunge 10% as Vijay’s TVK heads for big upset

For the full financial year FY26, the PSU reported a sharp rise in profitability, with net profit surging 200% to Rs 1,600.26 crore from Rs 533.90 crore in FY25.

Revenue for FY26 grew 19% year-on-year to Rs 33,782.18 crore, compared with Rs 28,339.48 crore in the previous year.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)