Dabur Q3 Results: Cons PAT grows 7% YoY to Rs 560 crore, revenue up 6%

Dabur India reported a 7% rise in its December quarter consolidated net profit at Rs 560 crore compared to Rs 522 crore reported in the year ago period. The profit after tax (PAT) is attributable to the owners of the holding company. The company's revenue from operations stood at Rs 3,559 crore in Q3FY26, up 6% over Rs 3,355 crore posted in the corresponding period of the last financial year.

The profit after tax (PAT) grew 24% sequentially from Rs 453 crore in Q2FY26 while the topline was up 11% from Rs 3,191 crore in the July-September quarter.

The Ayurveda major said that its FMCG Business reported a 6% growth during the quarter while its performance was broad-based across markets and categories.


Dabur's net profit before exceptional items surged 10% to Rs 575 crore, up from Rs 522 crore a year earlier, while operating profit grew 7.7% during the quarter at Rs 734 crore.

India Business

The India business saw Dabur's key brands and products report category-leading growths with market share gains across our key portfolio, led by a 193-bps improvement in hair oils market share. With this, Dabur's total hair oils market share now stands at its highest ever level of around 20%, the company filing claimed.

Dabur also reported 131 bps gain in air freshener market share with its total market share touching 44%. Dabur posted 195 bps gain in Juices & Nectars market share while its share in the 100% juices category grew by around 646 bps.

The Skin & Salon business reported a 6.6% growth while Hajmola, our flagship Digestives brand, grew by 7%. The foods business reported a 14% growth in Q3.

International business

Dabur's International Business reported strong growth of 11.1% during the third quarter, led by Turkey, MENA, US and Bangladesh.
MENA: Up 12.5%
Turkey: 15.4% growth
US: Up by 19.3%
Bangladesh: Grew 20.2%

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)