Prince Harry accepts UK publication's apology, 'substantial' damages

The damages are being donated by the royal to the Invictus Games Foundation.

AP
Prince Harry had sued the UK newspaper group for libel over two 'almost identical' articles published in October 2020, which claimed he had snubbed the Royal Marines after his royal exit.
LONDON: Britain's Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, has accepted an apology and "substantial" damages from Associated Newspapers over the publication of what he described as "baseless, false and defamatory stories" about him in the 'Mail on Sunday' and 'MailOnline', the High Court in London heard on Monday.

The 36-year-old grandson of Queen Elizabeth II, who stepped back from frontline royal duties last year, had sued the newspaper group for libel over two "almost identical" articles published in October 2020, which claimed he had snubbed the Royal Marines after his royal exit.

"The baseless, false and defamatory stories published in the 'Mail on Sunday' and on the website 'MailOnline' constituted not only a personal attack upon the Duke's character but also wrongly brought into question his service to this country," Jenny Afia, Harry's lawyer, told the court in a remote hearing.


She said that Associated Newspapers had accepted the allegations were false, "albeit after considerable damage was already done".

The damages, the amount of which remains undisclosed, are being donated by the royal to the Invictus Games Foundation, the organisation behind Harry's sporting venture for unwell and wounded war veterans. Harry's lawyer said this will allow the prince to "feel something good had come out of the situation".

The newspaper had published an apology in December 2020, but Harry's legal team believed it was not given the same prominence as the original articles and asked for permission for the settlement to be read out in open court.
ADVERTISEMENT

In a separate statement after the hearing, a spokesperson for Harry - who himself served in the British Army in the past - said his commitment to the military community was "unquestionable".

Associated Newspapers is yet to make a statement following Monday's hearing.

Prince Harry's wife, Meghan Markle - the Duchess of Sussex, is in a separate ongoing court battle with the newspaper group over articles that reproduced parts of a private handwritten letter to her father. Associated Newspapers denies allegations of breach of copyright and maintains it will strongly contest the case.

See You In Court: Prince Harry, Meghan Markle & Other Royals Who Battled It Out With Media
1/6

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are reportedly taking legal action against two tabloids for phone hacking and the unauthorised publication of a private letter. A look at other royals who battled it out with the media.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are reportedly taking legal action against two tabloids for phone hacking and the unauthorised publication of a private letter. A look at other royals who battled it ..
Read More

In 1993, Princess Diana sued the Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) because the Sunday Mirror published secretly-taken pictures of the royal exercising in a gym. She also sought a permanent ban on the publication of the pictures, which showed the princess clad in a leotard and cycling shorts. The paper apologised, and an out-ofcourt settlement was reached. In addition to the apology, the paper reportedly paid Diana’s legal costs of 1 million pounds plus a fur ther 200,000 pounds to charity.

In 1993, Princess Diana sued the Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) because the Sunday Mirror published secretly-taken pictures of the royal exercising in a gym. She also sought a permanent ban on the p..
Read More

Princess Caroline is the daughter of the legendary Hollywood star Grace Kelly and Rainier III, Prince of Monaco. She had a troubled relationship with the media growing up. In 2004, Caroline, represented by Matthias Prinz, won a landmark victory in the European Court of Human Rights, which confirmed that the publishing of paparazzi photographs taken of the princess in a public place was a violation of her right to privacy. The court drew a distinction between the activities of Caroline the princess and Caroline the woman.

Princess Caroline is the daughter of the legendary Hollywood star Grace Kelly and Rainier III, Prince of Monaco. She had a troubled relationship with the media growing up. In 2004, Caroline, repres..
Read More

Following Princess Caroline’s triumph in court, the Swedish family hired Matthias Prinz to represent them in court. It has been reported that in 2004, Prinz, on behalf of the Swedish royal family and chiefly King Carl XVI Gustaf and his German-born wife Queen Silvia, sued Germany’s biggest publishers over claims of 1,588 made-up stories, including more than 500 front-page ‘exclusives’. It has been reported that Prinz filed cases of defamation and invasion of privacy, which resulted in over 23 media outlets to print replies, apologies and retractions.

Following Princess Caroline’s triumph in court, the Swedish family hired Matthias Prinz to represent them in court. It has been reported that in 2004, Prinz, on behalf of the Swedish royal family a..
Read More

Prince Al-waleed is a Saudi billionaire, investor and a member of the royal family. In 2013, Forbes estimated his fortune at around $20 billion, which, the royal claimed, was less than the amount he disclosed to the magazine. The prince filed a defamation claim in London against the editor and two journalists. The Kingdom Holding Company, founded by Prince Al-Waleed, issued a statement saying that the magazine published a “deliberately insulting and in accurate description of the business community in Saudi Arabia”. In 2015, Forbes and Al-Waleed released statements that they had settled the dispute.

Prince Al-waleed is a Saudi billionaire, investor and a member of the royal family. In 2013, Forbes estimated his fortune at around $20 billion, which, the royal claimed, was less than the amount h..
Read More

In 2012, Kate Middleton and Prince William were vacationing in the south of France when paparazzi clicked some photos of the Duchess sunbathing topless. Two French magazines published the photos. In 2017, the Duke and Duchess sued six people in connection with the scandal. The French court found the photos to be an intrusion of privacy and fined the media outlets.

In 2012, Kate Middleton and Prince William were vacationing in the south of France when paparazzi clicked some photos of the Duchess sunbathing topless. Two French magazines published the photos. I..
Read More
Download
The Economic Times Business News App
for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
READ MORE
ADVERTISEMENT

READ MORE:

LOGIN & CLAIM

50 TIMESPOINTS

More from our Partners

Loading next story
Business News › Magazines › Panache › Prince Harry accepts UK publication's apology, 'substantial' damages
Text Size:AAA
Success
This article has been saved

*

+