ISD call-routing case: Final hearing on Jan 25
Last year, the CBI had filed a charge sheet against Manoj Modi and five others in a case relating to masking of international calls as local by Reliance Infocomm.
Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw also granted more time to RTI applicant P C Srivastava to file his reply on the CBI plea.
Earlier, on July 13, the court had stayed the operation and implementation of the May 27 CIC order for disclosure of informations while issuing notice to Srivastava.
The agency had refused to disclose information to the RTI applicant, saying doing so would affect its prosecution in the case.
"Disclosing such information would provide clues to other persons accused in the said case by which they would be able to argue why they should also not be charged," the CBI had said.
"Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act exempts disclosure of information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders".
Last year, the CBI had filed a charge sheet against Manoj Modi and five others in a case relating to masking of international calls as local by Reliance Infocomm when it was controlled by Mukesh-led RIL.
Srivastava had sought to know from the CBI the reasons for not making Ambani brothers as accused in the case relating to alleged manipulation and tampering of calling lines identification of ISD calls by Reliance Infocomm Ltd and thereby passing off international calls as local ones.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.