IFIN ex-CEO Bawa says LIC didn’t back Piramal’s IL&FS bid
The Piramal Group was close to take charge of the IL&FS Group in 2015 but the deal failed to take off.
The offer by the Piramal Group for IL&FS failed because LIC expected a higher price, according to statements made to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). An accused erstwhile top executive of IL&FS Financial Services (IFIN) said that while the offer from Piramal Enterprises Ltd (PEL) was found to be “very good”, LIC didn’t share the valuation report prepared by SBI Caps with them. Based on the evaluation report, LIC was asking for Rs 1,100 per share against the Rs 860 offered by PEL.

“I don’t know the reason why LIC refused the offer of Rs 860 per share approximately made by Piramal Group, but I think it was a good offer,” arrested erstwhile IFIN chief executive officer Ramesh Bawa said in his sworn statement to SFIO. “LIC was asking somewhere around Rs 1,100 per share.”
He elaborated on the process in his statement, which ET has seen.
“According to me, IDBI was hired by IL&FS for valuation of their share, whereas SBI Caps was hired by LIC which was independent and separately done by LIC,” Bawa said.
“The details of the valuation made by LIC were not shared with us. I wonder how this rate of Rs 1,100 per share was arrived at by LIC.” Emails and messages sent to LIC and SBI Caps remained unanswered till press time.
Rating agencies
The agencies uncovered email exchanges among accused erstwhile directors discussing ways of getting favourable ratings. Four companies had been involved in rating various instruments of IFIN during 2013-2018 — ICRA, CARE, India Ratings and Brickwork Ratings.
More than Rs 20,000 crore was invested by provident funds, mutual funds and insurance funds based on audit reports and credit ratings assigned to different instruments of the company and its units.
The IL&FS crisis first came to light in July 2018 when the road arm was facing difficulty in making repayments due on its bonds.
In May 2018, a day after ICRA communicated to IL&FS about downgrading ITNL to A- from A, Saha wrote to Parthasarathy: “ICRA has just now communicated ITNL rating to A- from A and continue with negative outlook. Request made to keep it under abeyance for discussion and response awaited.”
To this, Parthasarathy replied: “Spoken to Naresh and criticised them for jumping the gun without accounts being reviewed status on claims understood and awareness of the status of LS? … have requested him to wait until foregoing are done... He seemed receptive, and said he’d revert and try to hold on.”
It was in August 2018 that CARE downgraded nonconvertible debentures (NCDs) of IFIN worth Rs 4,800 crore. The next month, ICRA downgraded the paper. However, in August, ICRA had reaffirmed its A1+ rating on commercial paper while cutting the rating on debentures and long-term loans to AA+ from AAA.
In February 2017, Saha had sent an email with the subject line, “IECCL: CARE RATING ‘BBB’ — Outlook Stable”. In this email, he wrote: “This has been done with extreme pressure. Most critical will be to maintain these number of FY2017 having reconfirmed the same in the month of January 2017.”
When investigators asked him to explain the phrase “this has been done with extreme pressure”, Saha said, “The comment was made in the context of achieving the results for FY17 with only two months left in the financial year. Extreme pressure was in the context of agency agreeing on the company’s plan.”
The probe indicates that IL&FS “dictated” terms to the rating agencies.
In a series of email exchanges between senior management and the accused directors, Saha wrote to Rajesh Kotian, “I have already spoken to CARE and India Ratings and they are fully briefed to handle the investors’ query, if any.”
In another instance, where the accused are discussing the engagement of Crisil in a new business programme after it gave a negative rating, Saha wrote, “Post your meeting with Roopa Kudva, there has been a series of officials visiting for business development.
Crisil has just concluded the rating surveillance of ITNL and they would revert in next few days on the removal of the existing outlook negative. We would engage with them for the new businesses after the foregoing.”
The SFIO had cited an alleged instance of quid pro quo in its chargesheet filed in May. Bawa “assisted a senior director in Fitch Rating, Singapore, who appears to be involved in rating of IL&FS in buying a duplex villa of Rs 4.25 crore at a discounted price of Rs 3.25 crore”, stated the chargesheet.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.